Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

2012 PLJ 334

ABID HUSSAIN SHAH and 28 others vs GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Services and General Administration Department

Petitioner: ABID HUSSAIN SHAH and 28 others VS Respondent: GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Services and General Administration Department (Regulation Wing) Civil Secretrate, Lower Mall, Lahore and 3 others

Court: Lahore High Court Decision Date: 2011-09-22

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Ijaz-ul-Ahsan Title:ABID HUSSAIN SHAH and 28 others vs GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through

Secretary Services and General Administration Department (Regulation Wing) Civil Secretrate, Lower Mall, Lahore and 3 others Case No.: D. No. 80329 of 2011 Date of Judgment:2011-09-22 Reported As: PLJ 2012 Lahore 334 Result: Objection Overruled Judgment ORDER OFFICE OBJECTION The office has raised an objection that the present petition cannot be entertained for want of payment of the requisite Court-fee. 2. The learned counsel has referred to a judgment of this Court reported as PLD 2007 Lahore 461, in which it has been held that one set of Court fee is payable by several petitioners in cases where the impugned acts arise out of one action or one order. He has also referred to Rule 13 of the High Court Rules & Orders, which is reproduced as under: In cases where there are several appellants whose interest is joint, one fee is to be allowed unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Court has to direct to whom the fee be apportioned among several appellants in such proportion as it thinks fit." 3. In view of the foregoing, since all the petitioners complain of a single action and are employees of the same department, the office objection is overruled for the time being. Let the main case be listed for hearing on the judicial side.

Related Legal Research & Directories