A. H. NAZIBAR Rahmanltd, vs OMAR SONS LTD., DACCA — 1970 PLC 885

Citation: 1970 PLC 885

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-06-17

Parties: A. H. NAZIBAR Rahmanltd, vs OMAR SONS LTD., DACCA

Headnotes

Result: application is dismissed Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN).--This is- an application under section 25 (1) (b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, which will be hereinafter referred to as the Act.' The case of the first party was that he was appointed as Accounts Assistant on 1-12-56 and worked under the second party up to 31-7-b2.

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): S. A. Haleem, Muhammad Karim, Nurul Islam Khan Title: A. H. NAZIBAR Rahmanltd, vs OMAR SONS LTD., DACCA Case No.: Complaint Case No. 127 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-06-17 Reported As: 1970 PLC 885 Result: application is dismissed Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN).--This is- an application under section 25 (1) (b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, which will be hereinafter referred to as the Act.' The case of the first party was that he was appointed as Accounts Assistant on 1-12-56 and worked under the second party up to 31-7-b2. He then resigned in pursuance of the Company and then he was re-appointed as an Accountant on 1-6-63, at a monthly 'pay of Rs.300-00. Subsequently he was promoted as Assistant Manager and he worked as such till his services were terminated on 28-2-70. He was drawing a pay of Rs. 480-00 as basic and Rs. 96-00 as house rent at the time of his discharge. His prayer is for termination benefits. The second party contested the case by filing written statement wherein they stated that the first party was not a worker and his job, was of managerial and supervisory nature. He cannot claim any benefit under the Act. He has been given benefits as be is entitled to under the service rules of the company. The Labour Court is not the proper forum for him. Point for determination is whether the first party is a If worker' and whether he is entitled to any benefits under any…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.