Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUMTAZ ALI VS Respondent: THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, POULTRY DEVELOPMENT IN SINDH PHASE II, SUKKUR and 2 others
Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Agha Ali Hyder Title:MUMTAZ ALI vs THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, POULTRY DEVELOPMENT IN SINDH
PHASE II, SUKKUR and 2 others Case No.: Appeal No, SUK-96 of 1992 Date of Judgment:1992-03-22 Reported As: 1992 PLC 1234 Result: Appeal dismissed Judgment DECISION ' The appellant was appointed by the respondents as Poultry Attendant, on temporary basis and his services came to be terminated as he was found to have stolen six chickens from the Poultry Unit, Dadu. He had made representation to the Department. However, it has been found by the Labour Court that the grievance notice was time-barred. It is further found that in spite of the fact that the point of limitation had to be reckoned with, no postal receipt or any document was filed on behalf of the appellant to substantiate that the grievance notice was in time as required under the law. ' In the circumstances, there is no force in the contention of the appellant that the appeal was within time. I will therefore dismiss the appeal summarily.