Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: AMANULLAH and others VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Ausaf Ali Khan Title: AMANULLAH and others vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Misc. Nos.1313/M and 4593/B of 1992 Date of Judgment:1992-10-27 Reported As: 1993 P Cr. L J 743 Result: Order accordingly
Judgment ORDER Through this petition, the bail order passed by me on the 21st instant is sought to be modified to the extent of inclusion of section 368, P.P.C., therein. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that earlier the section was not mentioned in the F.I.R. And that, therefore, it was not pressed into service in the main bail application. He prays for incorporation thereof in the bail order. 2. There is no denying the fact that no allegation under section 368, P.P.C., was levelled against the petitioners in the F.I.R. It has been invoked much after. Even otherwise, invocation of the section will not make much difference respecting fate of the case. Therefore, the petitioners shall also be deemed to have been admitted to bail under section 368, P.P.C.