Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

1992 PLC(CS) 726

HABIBULLAH VS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, ISLAMABAD

Petitioner: HABIBULLAH VS Respondent: SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, ISLAMABAD

Court: FEDERAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

1992 P L C (C

1992 P L C (C.S.) 726

[Federal Service Tribunal]

Present: Syed Ally Madad Shah, Chairman and Rana Rifat Saeed Member

HABIBULLAH

Versus

SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, ISLAMABAD and 2 others

Appeal No. 130(R) of 1991, decided on 26th January, 1992.

Per Rana Rifat Saeed (Member)--

(a) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973)-

----S. 11(1)---Termination of service within probation period---Validity---Termination order did not mention that services of civil servant were terminated under S. 11(l), Civil Servants Act, 1973 and within probation period---Civil servant's departmental appeal addressed to his department was not forwarded to Appellate Authority and same, was considered, decided and rejected by an officer not authorised to do so---No reasons had been assigned for terminating civil servant's service nor a requisite notice had been given, nor salary in lieu of notice was .paid---Order of termination was set aside in circumstances.

Per Syed Ally Madad Shah (Chairman)--

(b) Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973---

----R. 21---Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), S. 11---Termination of service during probation---Validity---Civil servant's services having been terminated during probation did not offend the provisions of R. 21, Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973---Termination of civil servant's service was, thus, in accordance with the provision of S. 11, Civil Servants Act, 1973, and no reasons were required to be recorded therefore---No element of mala fides or bias was pointed out in ordering termination of civil servant's services---Appeal was not competent in circumstances, though civil servant was entitled to his full emoluments for the notice period.

Appellant in person.

Hafiz SA. Rahman for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 20th January, 1992.

Related Legal Research & Directories