Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

2003 MLD 1654

SYED-UL-AAIN vs THE STATE

Petitioner: SYED-UL-AAIN VS Respondent: THE STATE

Court: Lahore High Court Decision Date: 2002-09-08

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Khawaja Muhammad Sharif Title: SYED-UL-AAIN vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No,5573-B of 2002 Date of Judgment:2002-09-08 Reported As: 2003 MLD 1654 Result: Bail application dismissed

Judgment ORDER ' It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that only ineffective firing is attributed to the present petitioner, that he is behind the bars for the last 11 months, no more required by the police for further investigation and that his case is of further inquiry falling under subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner is named in the F.I.R., specific role is attributed to him and the offence alleged against him falls within the ambit of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Occurrence in this case had taken place on 28-6- 2002. Petitioner remained absconder for one year and four months. He has not only caused ineffective firing but has also given butt blow alongwith his co-accused to the complainant who is an injured and star witness of the prosecution. There are two deceased persons in this case. Offence falls within the ambit of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. No ground for bail is made out, therefore, this petition is dismissed.

Related Legal Research & Directories