Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD IQBAL VS Respondent: TOWN NAZIM, NORTH NAZIMABAD, KARACHI and others
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Mushir Alam, Muhammad Afzal Soomro Title: MUHAMMAD IQBAL vs TOWN NAZIM, NORTH NAZIMABAD, KARACHI and others Case No.: Constitution Petition No,D-225 of 2006 Date of Judgment:2006-08-31 Reported As: 2008 CLC 533 Result: Petition dismissed
Judgment ORDER ' Petitioner claims creation of hindrances in completion of work carried out by him and 5% work is not allowed to be carried out. For which the restriction order is sought. ' It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has completed the entire work and the bills are not paid. According to learned counsel the respondents are claiming heavy damages on account of his sub-standard work. ' Respondents have denied the allegation made in the petition and stated that the petitioner is not entitled for any relief. Quality of work is also disputed whether the petitioner is entitled for amount in respect of work carried out by him or otherwise is question of fact. ' Points involved in this petition require resolution of factual controversy as to the quality of work and his entitlement cannot resolve in writ jurisdiction. The petition is dismissed along with listed applications. However, the petitioner may seek appropriate remedy in other forum if so advised.