Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2024 SHC 711. In this matter between M.A. 212/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Adeel Mohammad Ahmed Thr. Aftab Ahmed Soomro (Appellant) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: M.A. 212/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2026 SHC KHI 711 PARTIES: Adeel Mohammad Ahmed Thr. Aftab Ahmed Soomro (Appellant) ORDER DATE: 01-APR-26 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ MA No.212 of 2024 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI

MA No.212 of 2024

Date Order with signature of the Judge

Hearing / Case. 1. For order on Office Objection. 2. For hearing of main case.

01.04.2026

Mr. Asif Rasheed, Advocate for the Appellant.

*****

It is an Appeal against the Order dated 19.11.2024, in which, while granting the Letter of Administration in SMA No. 240 of 2024 [the Subject SMA], request for relinquishment of share in favour of the Appellant, who was the Petitioner, was declined . The matter throughout has remained non - contentious. Despite publication in the Newspaper (available on record), no one has appeared to raise any objection. The learned Counsel has cited two unreported Judgments of this Court, passed in SMA No.164 of 2015 and SMA No.150 of 2018, copies whereof are available in the present LIS Record, but the same was not considered by the Court, because these Decisions are unreported and request is beyond the scope of the Subject SMA.

2. The undisputed facts are that the Deceased Father (Maqbool Ahmed) of the present Appellant, owned the following Immovable Properties in the Defence Housing Authority [DHA]_

1. Residential Plot bearing No.92, Sector 7 -D, measuring 500 Square Yards (Approx.), DHA City Karachi.

2. Residential Plot b earing No.S -68, Iqbal Lane -10, Phase - VIII-B, measuring 120 Square Yards (Approx.), DHA, Karachi.

2

MA No.212 of 2024

3. Residential Plot bearing No.S -75, Ayyubia Staff Lane -6, Phase-VII (Ext), measuring 100 Square Yards (Approx.), DHA, Karachi.

4. Residential Plot bearing No.71 /II, Khayaban -e-Iqbal, Phase-VIII-A, measuring 489 Square Yards (Approx.), DHA, Karachi. 5. Residential Plot bearing No.149, Khayaban -e-Arafat, Phase-VIII-E, measuring 1000 Square Yards (Approx.), DHA, Karachi.

3. The above Deceased -Maqbool Ahmed, passed away somewhere in the year 2019 and since there was no Objection, all the above Immovable Properties were transferred in the names of his Legal Heirs, including the Appellant, his Mother Ms. Rahat Naz, two Sisters, namely, Ms. Nida Falak, Sana Falak and the Grandmother-Sultana Begum.

4. Learned Counsel has placed on record all those Mutation Orders as well as the same fact is recorded in Paragraph-4 of the impugned Order.

5. The Grandmother-Mst. Sultana Begum, also passed away and for her share in all these Properties, the Subject SMA was filed, in which the above Order is passed. Learned Counsel has referred to the Affidavits of No Objection of the following Legal Heirs, namely_

i. Iqbal Ahmed ii. Muhammad Tariq iii. Rahat Naz Ahmed iv. Nida Falak Ahmed v. Sana Falak Ahmed vi. Yasmeen Asif vii. Muhammad Jawed Ahmed viii. Muhammad Naveed ix. Aftab Ahmed Soomro

3

MA No.212 of 2024

6. The above Affidavits of No Objection, filed by the legal heirs [the Releasors] of Sultana Begum (available from pages -53 onwards) except Mst. Nargis Akhter , who all reside abr oad, have given their no objection to the Petition , while relinquishing , releasing and discharging their 1/6 th undivided shares in favour of the Appellant. All these Affidavits of No Objection are notarized. To further verify the authenticity of these Affidavits, these persons were examined through Video Link by the learned Court (which practice is appreciated) , in order to expedite the matter involving the Overseas Pakistanis. This fact is mentioned in Paragraph -7 of the impugned Order , as well as Video Li nk Reports are also part of the record (at pages-75 to 79).

7. The above cited Decisions of this Court along with the Case Files [of the above SMA No. 164 of 2015 and 150 of 2018 ] are considered. In SMA No.164 of 2015, relinquishment of shares by some of the legal heirs was given effect to, inter alia, while granting the Letter of Administration, because those persons had executed separate Relinquishment Deeds duly attested by Pakistan Mission abroad [as those Persons at the relevant time were residing in the United States of America and Netherlands] , whereas, in SMA No. 150 of 2018, the relinquishment request was given effect to merely on the basis of formal Affidavits of No Objection to the main Petition filed by the legal heirs and residuaries, containing a specific paragraph about surrendering and relinquishment of their shares.

8. The reasoning mentioned in t he impugned Order for not following the above Case Law is misconceived in nature, untenable and cannot be sustained. It is a settled principle t hat a judicial precedent of superior courts whether reported or un -reported carry the same weight, force and effect, if

4

MA No.212 of 2024

the same is relevant to the controversy under dispute. Secondly, our Courts being Courts of record, the authenticity of the un -reported decisions can be checked by examining the Court Case File and now by the other prevalent modes and means. Thirdly, the above request of the Appellant with regard to the relinquishment of shares, in the present circumstances, was / is not beyond the scope o f SMA, as stated in the impugned Order, but it can be considered.

Now adverting to the main issue at hand, viz. relinquishment.

9. One should be mindful of the fact that in such kind of non- contentious matters relating to the distribution of inheritan ce, in particular, under the Islamic Law of Inheritance, a pragmatic approach is to be adopted by the Courts, specially, to facilitate those persons who reside outside Pakistan.

10. The learned Trial Court in this Case, had examined the legal heirs who sworn Affidavits of No Objection through video link, which practice is appreciated.

Consequently, Two Options are available to the Appellant and the above Releasors.

Option 1 – the Releasors can send the Deed(s) of Relinquishment duly notarized by Notar y Public, so also endorsed and attested by Pakistan Mission [as per the statutory procedure].

Option 2 – If the above is not possible due to genuine practical reasons, then D eed(s) of Relinquishment can be sent, duly notarized by Notary Public as is don e in the case of Affidavit of No Objections filed in the Subject SMA, but specifically stat ing the reason for not adhering to the

5

MA No.212 of 2024

Option 1 [ ibid]. Since the Releasors have been examined through video link, the documents sent under Option 2 will also be given full effect by the government functionaries and Authorities in Pakistan.

In view of the above, partly the impugned O rder is set -aside to the extent of non -considering the unreported judicial precedents of this Court and relinquishment request, whereas the other terms relat ing to the grant of Letter of Administration, as mentioned in the impugned Order, shall remain intact.

The Appeal is allowed in the above terms.

A Copy of this Decision be communicated to the learned Judicial Officer who has passed the impugned Order.

JUDGE

M.Javaid PA

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant