Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: IRSHAD AKHTAR GHULAB VS Respondent: INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE.Honorable Justice MUHAMMAD MEHMUD ASLAM PIRZADA
1992 P L C (C
1992 P L C (C.S.) 1032
[Service Tribunal Punjab]
Present: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member
IRSHAD AKHTAR GHULAB
versus
INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and another
Appeal No. 457 of 1989, decided on 19th August, 1990.
Civil service---
---- Adverse remarks---Remarks against civil servant were not supported by any specific complaint or material available on file and. reporting officer had not quoted any instance whether civil servant's relations with public had been questioned---Remarks "Integrity controversial" against civil servant were also not supported by any cogent evidence on file---Reporting officer had failed to point out if a single complaint of corruption was ever made to Authority against civil servant and any enquiry was conducted against him on charge of corruption---Authorities had failed to prove that there was any complaint against civil servant by public and also there was any counselling or warning administered to him by Authorities during disputed period---Civil servant admittedly worked very efficiently in affairs of Police Station concerned, curtailed crimes and he was promoted as Inspector and during period in question he also earned commendation certificates with cash awards as such adverse remarks "an average, officer with stinking reputation" against civil servant also were not supported by any sort of complaint or material on file-- Service Tribunal, set aside orders of Authorities with directions that adverse remarks against civil servant be expunged from his A.C.R.
Ch. Parmoon Bashir for Appellant.
A.G. Humayun for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 7th August, 1990