Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ZAHID IQBAL VS Respondent: THE STATE
1988 M L D 1755
1988 M L D 1755
[Lahore]
Before Riaz Ahmad J
ZAHID IQBAL‑ ‑Petitioner
versus
TUE STATE‑‑Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3396/B of 1988, decided on 19th October, 1988.
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑--
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 408/381‑‑Bail‑‑Alleged embezzled amount had been paid by the accused‑‑Accused was behind the bars for four months‑‑Trial of case had not yet commenced‑‑State counsel conceded that amount had already been paid by the accused‑‑Accused admitted to bail in circumstances.
Shahid Hussain Qadri for Petitioner.
Shawar Khilji for the State.
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that the alleged embezzled amount has already been paid by the petitioner, and the petitioner is behind the bars for the last four months, and the trial of this case has not yet commenced. It is further stated that nothing is to be recovered and hence the petitioner deserves the grant of bail. Learned counsel for the State concedes, that the amount has already been paid by the petitioner. In this view of the matter, I direct, that the petitioner shall be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rupees fifty thousand only with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/Duty Magistrate, Lahore.
M.A.K./Z‑73/L Bail granted.