Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

KHALID AHMAD vs Mst. NISHAT AFROZ AND 2 OTHER — 1971 PLD 22

Citation: 1971 PLD 22

Court: Sindh High Court

Year: 1967

Decision Date: 1967-10-10

Parties: KHALID AHMAD vs Mst. NISHAT AFROZ AND 2 OTHER

Headnotes

Case cited as PLD 1971 Karachi 22

Judgment Text

Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Qadeer-ud-Din Ahmad Title: KHALID AHMAD vs Mst. NISHAT AFROZ AND 2 OTHER Case No.: Revision Application No, 127 of 1966 Date of Judgment:1967-10-10 Reported As: PLD 1971 Karachi 22 Result: Application dismissed Judgment JUEGMENT This revision application has been filed to question the order of a Civil Judge, First Class, Karachi, dated the 29th of March 1966, which is as follows :- "I am fully convinced that the learned counsel of the plaintiff respondent No, I due to mistake in a suit for accounts has stated these facts in connection with which he has prayed that these facts be omitted. If this amount is allowed, then it will in no way prejudice the case of the defendant. It will not at all change the nature of the suit. Earlier or later the plaintiff shall have to pay the court-fee stamp. Even the amendment as sought is not belated one. So in the interest of justice I allow the amendment as prayed for." 2. The facts which form the background of the above order are that the respondent No, 1 filed a suit for accounts; and valued it in paragraph 8 of the plaint as follows : "That for the purpose of court-fee and jurisdiction the suit for the present is valued Rs, 200 on which proper court-fee has been accordingly paid. The plaintiff however undertakes to pay proper court- fee on whatever share has been found out of a rendition of account by the defendants." Before the above paragraph, in, paragraph 6 of the plaint she stated: "That the…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.