Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: Mat. RASHIDA Alias BENGALLAN VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry Title: Mat. RASHIDA Alias BENGALLAN vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1483 of 1985 Date of Judgment:1986-01-11 Reported As: 1986 P Cr. L J 2316 Result: Proceedings quashed
Judgment ORDER The applicant is facing proceedings under section 8(3)(6) of the Sind Crime Control Act. The notice was issued on 19-12-1982 and the prosecution has failed to produce the witnesses against the applicant. The maximum period of three years has already expired and a person cannot be bound down beyond a maximum period of three years. The learned Addl. A.-G. Has frankly conceded to this position. The proceedings pending in the Court of S.D.M. Garden are quashed.