Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD RASHID VS Respondent: NATIONAL HOSIERY FACTORY Ltd. and another
Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi Title: MUHAMMAD RASHID vs NATIONAL HOSIERY FACTORY Ltd. and another Case No.: Appeal No, FD-431 of 1984 Date of Judgment:1984-11-27 Reported As: 1985 PLC 527 Result: Appeal accepted
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT ' The decision, dated 12-6-1984 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No,5, Faisalabad has been challenged in this appeal, whereby the grievance petition of the appellant for his re-instatement in service was dismissed. 2. The case of the appellant is that factory gate was closed upon him. The respondent took up the plea that the appellant was still in service but was absent since long and was being proceeded against for that. It was contended that no grievance notice was served but the learned lower Court has not recorded any finding on the point. 3. Since the respondents admit that the appellant is still in service a direction to give him duty may be given although the respondents A are at liberty to take action for the absence of the appellant. As the learned lower Court has not recorded any finding on the point of service of grievance notice, the case is liable to be remanded. 4. As a result, the appeal is accepted and setting aside the impugned decision of the learned lower Court, the case is remanded for re-decision.