Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 3244. In this matter between Const. P. 1185/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Asma Bano Rizvi & Anoth3er (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 1185/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 3244 PARTIES: Asma Bano Rizvi & Anoth3er (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 03-NOV-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ [1]

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. S-1185 of 2025

Date Order with signature of Judge(s)

1. For order on office objection Nos.1 to 5 alongwith reply as at “A” 2. For hearing of CMA No.7652/2025 (U/A 199) 3. For hearing of main case

03.11.2025

Syed Qamber Abbas advocate for the petitioners Mr. Ali Safdar Depar, Assistant AG Mr. Mumtaz Ali Shah, Assistant PG Mr. Raza Mian, DSP (Legal-II) CPO PI Zahid Lodhi, SHO PS Gulberg, Karachi SI Ghulam Mustafa Rajper, PS Gulberg, Karachi --------------------------------

It is, inter alia, contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner No.2 is lawful owner and purchaser of Plot No.548 (Old No.E -407) and Plot No.549 (Old No.E-408), Sheet No.1, Moosa Colony, Gulberg Town, Karachi purchased in 1975 through a lawful agreement; that subsequently on 21.9.2025 , a settlement agreement was executed between petitioner No.2, his four brothers and son Muhammad Ahmed Khan (respondent No.11) of his deceased brother and it was mutually agreed that whenever the said plots are sold, the petitioner shall voluntarily give 50% share of one plot to Jameel Ahmed Khan and 50% share of Plot No.E-407 to Muhammad Ahmed Khan and all brother s expressly raised no objection to this agreemen t. He further contended that respondent No.9 and respondent No.11 alongwith their wives i.e. respondent No.10 and respondent No.12 became greedy and dishonest and took illegal assistance from the police officials (respondents No.7 and 8) and forcibly dispo ssessed the petitioners from the said plot on 25.10.2025. He further contended that the petitioners submitted complaint to the SHO Police Station Gulberg alongwith respondents No.2 to 5 requesting registration of FIR and to take action against the culprits. Today, learned Assistant PG submits that the FIR No.520 of 2025 has been registered in PS Gulberg District Central, Karachi under Section 324/448/34 PPC. The purpose of filing this petition prima facie is served, therefore, no further action on the part of this Court required. However, it is made clear that no harassment shall be caused to either party by the police, who shall be neutral in the private affairs. If there is a criminal / civil litigation between the parties, the same shall be taken care of by the competent Court of law. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed application.

JUDGE

Zahid/*

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant