Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

1986 PLC 1141

MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED vs GHULAM NABI

Petitioner: MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED VS Respondent: GHULAM NABI

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Decision Date: 1986-06-03

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi Title: MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED vs GHULAM NABI Case No.: Revision No. FD-314 of 1986 Date of Judgment:1986-06-03 Reported As: 1986 PLC 1141 Result: Revision dismissed

Judgment ORDER The order, dated 13-4-1986 recorded by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 4, Faisalabad is reported to be without jurisdiction and of no legal effect. 2. The learned lower Court vide order, dated 15-9-1985 had adjourned the case sine die awaiting the decision of the Supreme Court on the point whether the Labour Courts have jurisdiction. The petitioner made a miscellaneous application for the decision of the case one way or the other. The said application has been disallowed by the impugned order. 3. It had been argued before the learned lower Court and the same point has been raised before me that since this tribunal has recorded finding on the question of jurisdiction, the learned lower Court should have passed some kind of orders. The cases were piling up in this Court, so I declined to adjourn such cases sine die. If the learned lower Court has little number of cases, it was quite justified in adjourning the cases sine die. The order does not suffer from any 1B legal infirmity for which exercise of suo motu powers of revision may be considered necessary. 4. As a result, the revision fails and is dismissed in limine. A. E.

---

## Page 2

revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.

Related Legal Research & Directories