Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 3242. In this matter between Const. P. 1156/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Mst. Saima & Another (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 1156/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 3242 PARTIES: Mst. Saima & Another (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 03-NOV-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ [1]

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. S-1156 of 2025

Date Order with signature of Judge(s)

1. For order on office objection Nos.1 to 6 and reply as at “A” 2. For hearing of main case

03.11.2025

Mr. Irfan Gul Memon advocate for the petitioners alongwith petitioners Mr. Ali Safdar Depar, Assistant AG Mr. Mumtaz Ali Shah, Assistant PG Ghulam Ahmed Shaikh, DSP / SDPO, Sukhan District Malir, Karachi PI Shaukat Ali Shar, PS Sukhan, District Malir, Karachi Inspector Ghulam Mustafa Solangi, SHO PS Jati, District Sujawal as well as on behalf of the SSP District Sujawal --------------------------------

Petitioners are present along with their counsel. It is inter alia contended that petitioner No.1 Mst. Saima has contracted marriage with petitioner No.2 Sudeer, against the wishes of her parents. Photo copies of Nikahnama and affidavit of freewill are annexed as annexure s A and B along with petition. It is further submitted that private respondents No.7 to 23 being annoyed fro m the marriage of the petitioners are harassing them and there is serious apprehension that they may be killed as a Karo-Kari. This Court vide order dated 23.10.2025, issued notices to the respondents with directions to the SHO concerned to provide protect ion to the petitioners . Today, the private respondents are called absent without intimation. The SHO present in Court submits that due protection shall be provided to the petitioners. He is directed to obtain bond of Rs.500,000/ - (Rupees five lac) each fro m the private respondents to the effect that no bodily harm shall be caused to the petitioners and the same bonds shall be kept at the police station and can be used against them if there is harm caused to the petitioners. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

JUDGE

Zahid/*

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant