Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS Respondent: ALLAHABAD MILLING CO. (PVT.) LTD
Court Name: Allahabad High Court Judge(s): V. N. Khare, S. R. Alam Title: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs ALLAHABAD MILLING CO. (PVT.) LTD Case No.: Income Tax Reference No,30 of 1980 Date of Judgment:1995-08-28 Reported As: 1998 PTD 1072 Result: Order accordingly
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT ' The Income-tax Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following questions of law under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for opinion of this Court: "(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on true interpretation of the lease agreement and the memorandum of association of the assessee-company, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the income earned by the assessee from leasing out of the cold storage and ice plant to Rajendra prasad Kishan Lal should be assessed as 'profits and gains' of business and not under the head 'other sources'? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the income from leasing out of the cold storage and ice plant should be assessed as profits and gains of business in spite of the fact that such income was assessed under the head ' other sources' till the assessm ent year 1959-60?" ' An identical question between the parties has been decided in Income-tax Reference No,42 of 1979 connected with Income-tax Reference No,236 of 1979---CIT v. Allahabad Milling Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. (1992) 195 ITR 325 (All), decided by the Hon'ble Chief Justice and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sakha Ram Singh on April 2, 1991. ' In view of the above, we answer the questions in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. No order as to costs.